If you all remember, I posted a review of Channel 4’s The Promise a couple of days ago. This blog post was very popular and I got an increase in hits on that specific post. As you remember I was very positive in my review of the TV drama. I explained how it portrayed Palestine both in its current state, and historic tragedy, very accurately. The way in which it captured the lasting tragedy of the Nakba and its continued relevance today was breathtaking. Also, the fact that it didn’t fall into a simplistic false equivalence between the suffering of Palestinians and israelis was refreshing. The drama was also fantastic and the writing was beautiful. It was subtle when it needed to be, and in your face when it was necessary. All in all an excellent piece of television.
It should come as no surprise that zionists were not exactly thrilled about the series. In their opinion it was an antisemitic attack on all Jews everywhere. I’ve already discussed this numerous times on this blog, a search of the terms zionism, israel, palestine, antisemitism, racism, BDS, Nakba, will give you the relevant posts. As I said, my post on The Promise attracted a lot of traffic. However, for a few days I had no comments. Today came with a bunch of comments. One of them was nice the other four were from zionists who didn’t like the fact that I liked The Promise.
I thought I’d go through them and think about what they are saying. I have to admit that one of them actually made me laugh. It was a clever reference to something I wrote in my post. As you remember I had written that 15 minutes in the first episode I wanted to smash my laptop repeatedly on the wall. Well this led Yisrael Medad to respond to my post by commenting: “You’ve just made me feel like I should take my computer and smash it.” I think this is clever, not very constructive but at least funny. Reader Sergio agreed with Yisrael’s assessment and commented: “that makes two of us”. Again not constructive, and in this case I have to admit not clever either.
The point is that my post had raised their ire for some reason. I don’t know why exactly, as they don’t expand on the reasons why I’ve made them want to take their computers and smash them. Maybe it’s got nothing to do with the subject and it’s just that they don’t like my writing style. Maybe they know me and somehow hate my guts. Maybe the layout and design of my blog just makes them boil with rage. This last reason is only partly my fault as I use a wordpress design. I didn’t design my blog, but I chose that particular look. So I think that if that is why they’re so angry, they might want to have a word with wordpress about it.
Now there were two other comments which were a bit more verbose about their dislike of my post. I’d like to talk about the first one I got last, because it makes a point that I want to address. So the last comment I got today was courtesy of reader Sharon Klaff who writes: “If you believe this to be a great production you must be delusional. I guess the handy chain and lock with key in situ is plausable to you, particlarly as the petulent Erin found it in 3 seconds flat. This small scene epitomises poor production in terms of fact and direction. I’ll remember never to watch anything you recommend.” Now let’s go through this comment, because the criticism of my liking The Promise, and of the series itself, doesn’t seem to be coming from where you would think.
So Sharon states that I must be delusional if I believe this (The Promise) to be a great production. The use of the word must is central here. It is a fact that the only way I would rate this production as great is if I am in fact delusional. Only by having actually lost touch with reality and fallen prey to some kind of pathological loss of judgement, could I possibly think this a great production. Now Sharon is helpful, s/he gives me a reason why I must be delusional. S/he doesn’t want to just make an unsubstantiated statement. S/he uses a scene as an example of the “poor production in terms of fact and direction’. Now this scene is quite central to the plot and I don’t really want to give it away. So I’ll try to give away as little as possible. Erin, the main character, finds herself in a situation where she is in someone’s house and needs to find a chain and lock. She looks around and finds both objects very quickly. That epitomises poor production in the eyes of Sharon.
It seems to me that Sharon needs to explore the concept of the suspension of disbelief a little more closely. Now I’m not saying that S/he is incapable of getting it. But to me that does not sound like a particularly poor example. I mean if you need to find a chain you look where there are tools and you find it. It’s not even that hard to imagine it happening in real life. However, that simple act in this scene drove Sharon over the edge it seems. I mean it made him/her so angry that my liking of the Promise meant that s/he felt compelled to let me know that all my past and future recommendations were null and void. I have shown so little judgement, or so much delusional judgement, that s/he felt compelled to tell me that: “I’ll remember never to watch anything you recommend.” I’d like to think that the reason why my liking of the Promise, which most critics applauded at least for its dramatic production, has angered Sharon so much has more to do with politics then the reason given. It’s just a hunch.
Now we come to the last message, which I think is the most interesting one. This comment was made courtesy of Walt Kovacs who writes: ”
like the wire????
you have gotta be kidding
the wire was filled with characters that were all painted with shades of gray
this production made everything black and white
jews bad
arabs good
this series was made for you….because you already believe that
oh….and len was wrong….not only did israel thrive….it continues to thrive…to the consternation of you…and the arab states”
Now I wanted to reproduce it as it came because I think that it has an interesting visual aspect to it. It’s almost like the nuttery of the person who wrote it has expressed itself not only in the form of free form poetry, which it clearly is, but also visually. Now, you might say: “come on H why are you calling old Walt here a nutter? You’re just being insulting for no reason! He just wanted to share his opinion with you”. Now I would agree with that, if old Walt here hadn’t made assumptions about me and insulted me. I will however have the decency of going through his comment and deconstruct it a little bit to show why he is in fact a nutter, but not any nutter, a zionist nutter.
Let’s begin with the first line “like the wire????” Notice the use of four question marks here. Now this isn’t a question. I think that Walt is trying to convey a sense of complete and utter surprise at one of my closing statements which placed The Promise on the same level as The Wire and Battlestar Galactica, in terms of great television. I’d like to note that the use of an exclamation mark, or and exclamation mark after the question mark, would have been the grammatically correct course of action. Now we all know that I am in no place to lecture on grammar or spelling, I am very bad at them, but I do know that one’s nuttery is proportional to one’s use of some extra punctuation. Specifically question marks and exclamation marks. As we’ll see in a second it is also inversely proportional to the use of full stops. In other words, the less full stops one uses the more of a nutter they are.
Now Walt doesn’t leave it there and in the next verse of his free form poem he continues “you have gotta be kidding”. Now the use of gotta rather got to, which is the correct English written form, suggests that this poem is meant to be seen as a spoken word poem. It is not there to be read but must be heard. Of course the nature of a blog comment being what it is, he had to write it down, but clearly he’s making the point that it is meant to be spoken. I’d like you all to notice the lack of a full stop after this statement, and any punctuation for that matter, I think an exclamation mark might have been useful here. Unlike Sharon though Walt doesn’t accuse me of being delusional, only of kidding. Indeed, it seems that my opinion, which sees The Promise as being somehow on the same level as the Wire, can only make sense if it is said in jest.
He explain why in the next two verses: “the wire was filled with characters that were all painted with shades of gray/this production made everything black and white”. Now the use of gray rather than grey clearly shows that Walt is using American English, there’s nothing inherently wrong with that it’s just interesting to note. The first verse is something I agree wholeheartedly with. The Wire is indeed filled with characters that are painted with shades of grey. His following verse however, I have a problem with. He states that this production made everything black and white. That’s not what I felt. It seems to me that this production is filled with complex characters that grow and change and are produced by their experiences and surroundings in a highly realistic way. But maybe I’m wrong. He very helpfully explains how in fact this production makes everything black and white.
He writes, in I have to admit a lovely rhythmic mirroring: “Jews bad/arabs good” Again, full stops are completely absent, but also here we find that verbs disappear. But let’s explore these statements a little more closely. He affirms that The Promise paints all Jews as bad and all Arabs as good. I take real issue with that. Many of the israeli Jews are in fact very complex. Take the parents of Erin’s best friend for example. They are a lovely nice couple of liberal israelis. They don’t believe in the occupation and want to have a two state solution. They believe in the rule of law and want to use legal and peaceful means to achieve that. However, they have never really been in contact with Palestinians. The mother’s father was one of the Jewish terrorists in the 1940s. They want to live side by side with the Palestinians but are very uncomfortable when Erin brings one to their home.
Take their son, who’s a peace activist. His experiences in the IDF led him to believe that israel is in fact an apartheid regime and is not a democracy. He is very active in direct action and travels to the West Bank on a regular basis to try and help Palestinians and make a difference. He was however ready to take up arms when an IDF position in which him and Erin were staying in Hebron was attacked at night out of loyalty for the people he served with. Now, it seems to me that these characters are painted with a plethora of colours. However, I think that the problem Walt has, is that there are bad israelis and bad Jews. Those are represented for what they are without compromise. The settlers in Hebron who throw stones, garbage, and insult the Palestinians on a daily basis are shown for what they are, evil. It is wrong to think that just because there is another side to this story that side has any value. This production doesn’t fall in the trap of making excuses. It shows things as they are.
If we continue with the poem we get to a somehow disturbing part. Walt writes: “this series was made for you….because you already believe that” Now I like the use of the … in order to mimic the dramatic pause that he would make when speaking this poem. He affirms that I believe that all Jews are bad and all Arabs are good, that is why I like this series. It was made for people like me you see. Now what are people like me? I don’t think it takes a very intelligent person to crack the code. He is saying that I am a racist and an antisemite. Now I have to say, I was surprised by this statement, because until he made it I thought I was actually a descent guy. I know I’m not perfect, but I thought at least I wasn’t a racist. I mean I’ve always made sure to distinguish between Jewish and zionist for example. I have spoken out against arab tyrants and their repressive regimes, which led me to some trouble. I have defended the rights of oppressed minorities in the countries I’ve lived in. But clearly I was wrong. Walt here knows better. He has told me straight to my face that the only reason I like the series is that it was made for people like me, namely racists.
You know, I have to say I feel liberated now that I know that I am actually a racist. It’s good to know that refusing to identify a people, the Jews (whatever that means, as a culture, a religion, an ethnicity), with a political ideology, zionism, makes me an antisemite. See I thought that identifying a people with a political ideology was the racist thing to do, like identifying Jews with communism, in Nazi Germany, or with Capitalism, in Soviet Russia. I innocently, and clearly antisemitically, thought that it was the same thing here. Also, basing my opinion on the facts that most zionists aren’t Jewish and most Jewish people aren’t zionists is clearly racist of me. How could I be so blind as to think that my opposition to the forceful and violent ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948, and the subsequent occupation, and discriminatory policies of the israeli state towards the arab population of Palestine was not due to some belief in the right of all human beings to their basic rights, but was in fact a clear display of my clear antisemitism?
Walt ends with a very poignant verse. He writes: “oh….and len was wrong….not only did israel thrive….it continues to thrive…to the consternation of you…and the arab states”. Now this last verse, which also ends conspicuously without a full stop, refers to Lens, who is the other major character in The promise, he is Erin’s grand father. The verse also refers to the last entry in his diary where he writes: “We’ve left the Arabs in the shit. But what about the Jews and their bloody state for which they fought so hard? Three years ago I would have said give them whatever they want, they deserve it after all they have been through. Now I’m not so sure. This precious state of theirs has been born in violence and in cruelty to its neighbours. I’m not sure how it can thrive.”
Walt makes a poignant rebuttal to that statement. He states that israel has in fact thrived and continues to thrive to both my and the arab states’ consternation. Now I have to admit that my ego was aggrandised a little by that statement. I mean he puts me on the same level as a whole bunch of states. I would have never thought of myself as somehow equivalent to a single state let alone 22 of them, I’m not Louis XIV after all. But Walt seems to think so, so I have to accept it as fact. It’s interesting that he thinks that israel is thriving at a moment in history when it is quite isolated internationally. The US seems to be the only ally it can count on unconditionally. The BDS movement keeps growing and criticism of israel and its policies has become extremely common place.
I would have thought that the myriad of artists refusing to play in israel, the countless number of cities, trade unions, academics, students, and citizens that are refusing to buy products manufactured in israel and the settlements and by companies who do business with israel is a sign that israel isn’t in fact thriving. I thought that the fact that racist and non-democratic policies are being passed by the Knesset on a regular basis is a sign that israel is in fact not thriving. The fact that the division between the secular and the religious segments of israeli society and the increasingly violent expression of that division was evidence that israel is not thriving. I am however, clearly wrong. Walt says otherwise, and as I’ve stated before he knows better.
Also, it is strange to talk about the consternation of Arab states that israel is thriving. Egypt and Jordan particularly, seem to have banked on israel thriving. The Mubarak regime in Egypt has paid a bit of a price for that gamble it would seem. I would agree that the special relationship with israel isn’t the sole factor in the uprising, but to deny that it played a central role would be I think delusional, to borrow Sharon’s words. I think that Walt is just not facing the facts. The apartheid regime of israel cannot sustain itself. The two state solution has died because israel insisted on creating facts on the ground by expanding settlements. The only solution left is the one state solution, which would mean that Jews and Arabs would share the land as equals, one person one vote. But I’m sure that me wanting this to happen is another sign of my antisemitism and hatred of all things Jewish. I do like brisket though.